The Fulani Jihads seemed to be really successful in terrorizing most of West Africa from 1700-1903. It seems as if they were the West African equivalent of the Vikings or Mongols.
90 views
+4 votes

Please log in or register to opinion this Issue.

4 Opinions

(6k points) opinion
They weren’t Vikings or Mongols equivalent. “Viking” as a word implies raiding, the equivalent would be the Tuaregs. The Mongols were a Calvary based coalition formed & beholden initially at least to the singular authority of the Khan, the jihads were more decentralised & initially in Sokoto, primarily infantry-based.
0 votes
(6k points) opinion
The jihadists, especially the more famous ones of the 19th-century, could be described as Bolsheviks. They latched onto existing feelings of grievance against the system, lent it ideological coherence & tried to engineer a revolutionary shift from the status-quo, with time, become like the very regimes they overthrew.

Comment

0
(6k points) commented
Though, they were brought back to earth by their Economic limitations.
0 votes
(2.1k points) opinion
Understanding the success of the Fulani Jihadists requires understanding the nature of warfare in the Central Sudan.
0 votes
(2.1k points) opinion
They're Calvary States organised around a Birni, the capital city which functioned both as the Royal Court & a trading stop on the Trans-Saharan routes.The Sarki, Kings derived their authority from traditional law which situated them as the fount of legitimacy. Wars're either slave raids, sieges or clashes b/w Calvary.
0 votes